- This topic has 7 voices and 10 replies.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 30, 2013 at 1:10 am #10301
Trevor G FullbrightModeratorHe was on other podcast.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbEstHbDhkQ
November 30, 2013 at 1:21 am #209828
Richard SchmittModeratorThanks for the hook up!
November 30, 2013 at 3:08 am #209829
MagParticipantPretty cool.Sounds as if he is preparing to do some pseudo-scientific medical experiments on his own to back up some theories where the research just isn't available.
November 30, 2013 at 3:38 am #209830
GnomerParticipantgood stuff
November 30, 2013 at 5:45 pm #209831
Brandon D ChristParticipantFrom what I understand, Kiefer's explanation of the “secondary fat storage mechanism” may render the low fat backload to be useless. Then again, the amount of available triglycerides for storage might be less if you follow the fat rules.
November 30, 2013 at 6:09 pm #209832
GnomerParticipantFrom what I understand, Kiefer's explanation of the "secondary fat storage mechanism" may render the low fat backload to be useless. Then again, the amount of available triglycerides for storage might be less if you follow the fat rules.
yea i guess it would depend how high your normal fat intake is overall as well.. i dunno i never found it mattered much for CBL either way personally
November 30, 2013 at 6:16 pm #209833
Brandon D ChristParticipantFrom what I understand, Kiefer's explanation of the "secondary fat storage mechanism" may render the low fat backload to be useless. Then again, the amount of available triglycerides for storage might be less if you follow the fat rules.
yea i guess it would depend how high your normal fat intake is overall as well.. i dunno i never found it mattered much for CBL either way personally
Same with me.
November 30, 2013 at 9:41 pm #209834
Trevor G FullbrightModeratorFrom what I understand, Kiefer's explanation of the "secondary fat storage mechanism" may render the low fat backload to be useless. Then again, the amount of available triglycerides for storage might be less if you follow the fat rules.
yea i guess it would depend how high your normal fat intake is overall as well.. i dunno i never found it mattered much for CBL either way personally
Same with me.
Same here. I normally just eat what sounds good.
December 1, 2013 at 5:00 am #209835
38specialMemberFrom what I understand, Kiefer's explanation of the "secondary fat storage mechanism" may render the low fat backload to be useless. Then again, the amount of available triglycerides for storage might be less if you follow the fat rules.
yea i guess it would depend how high your normal fat intake is overall as well.. i dunno i never found it mattered much for CBL either way personally
Same with me.
Same here. I normally just eat what sounds good.
December 1, 2013 at 5:01 am #209836
38specialMemberI concur.
December 1, 2013 at 10:46 pm #209837
Gl;itch.eMemberFrom what I understand, Kiefer's explanation of the "secondary fat storage mechanism" may render the low fat backload to be useless. Then again, the amount of available triglycerides for storage might be less if you follow the fat rules.
yea i guess it would depend how high your normal fat intake is overall as well.. i dunno i never found it mattered much for CBL either way personally
The "secondary fat storage mechanism" is an interesting one. Im not sure if keeping fat intake low would have much of an effect if calories are the same. Considering that gut bacteria can make a lot of SCFAs from certain foods (fibre, starches) and mead acid (omega -9) can be made from sugars. I think this makes the case for a "balanced" macro intake as the body obviously needs all three to function and will borrow from one (whether endogenously or exogenously sourced) to make up for a shortfall in another.
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.