- This topic has 6 voices and 7 replies.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 27, 2012 at 8:48 pm #2367
Richard SchmittModeratorI know I used to do this…sometimes still do…Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk
June 27, 2012 at 8:55 pm #58818
Brandon D ChristParticipantI don't really understand. Are you being sarcastic?
June 27, 2012 at 8:59 pm #58819
Richard SchmittModeratorPretty much. That eating is needed not eating nothing. Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk
June 27, 2012 at 10:46 pm #58820
McLeod2012MemberIt just goes back to where people think a calorie is a calorie. This might work for a short period of time. If you want to be miserable and skinny fat. Also, once you stop losing weight aren't eating ANYTHING, what will you do next? It's just dumb and unsafe.
June 29, 2012 at 2:04 pm #58821
ChuckMemberYea, especially with the media and government shooting nutritional advice out their ass- It’s their rhetoric that has doomed the baby boomers and almost generation X,Y, finally fats are considered good, carb cycling is suggested, and a calorie is not a calorie invented 300 years ago by burning our food. ;D Funny times.
June 29, 2012 at 2:20 pm #58822
Brandon D ChristParticipantYea the USDA's nutritional advice is based on old studies taken out of context as well as commercial interests. Also the medical profession deserves a lot of blame for this..
June 29, 2012 at 4:30 pm #58823
KieferParticipantThe real problem in this country is that our nutritional standards aren't based on any controlled research whatsoever, only observational work.As a brief example of the crappy results this produces, the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP)'s first dietary guidelines to reduce cholesterol levels followed the low-fat, low-saturated fat, low-animal fat paradigm to the letter. The result: the NCEP I diet was the most successful program to date for raising cholesterol levels, blood pressure and incidence of heart-attack. NCEP II wasn't much better. They're on NCEP III and they still haven't based the recommendations on a single study.
July 1, 2012 at 2:49 pm #58824
Dr. Rocky PatelParticipantThe real problem in this country is that our nutritional standards aren't based on any controlled research whatsoever, only observational work.As a brief example of the crappy results this produces, the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP)'s first dietary guidelines to reduce cholesterol levels followed the low-fat, low-saturated fat, low-animal fat paradigm to the letter. The result: the NCEP I diet was the most successful program to date for raising cholesterol levels, blood pressure and incidence of heart-attack. NCEP II wasn't much better. They're on NCEP III and they still haven't based the recommendations on a single study.
+1
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.