Keifer lets us know he’s still alive

  • This topic has 7 voices and 10 replies.
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #10301
    #209828

    Richard Schmitt
    Moderator

    Thanks for the hook up!

    #209829

    Mag
    Participant

    Pretty cool.Sounds as if he is preparing to do some pseudo-scientific medical experiments on his own to back up some theories where the research just isn't available.

    #209830

    Gnomer
    Participant

    good stuff

    #209831

    Brandon D Christ
    Participant

    From what I understand, Kiefer's explanation of the “secondary fat storage mechanism” may render the low fat backload to be useless.  Then again, the amount of available triglycerides for storage might be less if you follow the fat rules.

    #209832

    Gnomer
    Participant

    From what I understand, Kiefer's explanation of the "secondary fat storage mechanism" may render the low fat backload to be useless.  Then again, the amount of available triglycerides for storage might be less if you follow the fat rules.

    yea i guess it would depend how high your normal fat intake is overall as well.. i dunno i never found it mattered much for CBL either way personally

    #209833

    Brandon D Christ
    Participant

    From what I understand, Kiefer's explanation of the "secondary fat storage mechanism" may render the low fat backload to be useless.  Then again, the amount of available triglycerides for storage might be less if you follow the fat rules.

    yea i guess it would depend how high your normal fat intake is overall as well.. i dunno i never found it mattered much for CBL either way personally

    Same with me.

    #209834

    From what I understand, Kiefer's explanation of the "secondary fat storage mechanism" may render the low fat backload to be useless.  Then again, the amount of available triglycerides for storage might be less if you follow the fat rules.

    yea i guess it would depend how high your normal fat intake is overall as well.. i dunno i never found it mattered much for CBL either way personally

    Same with me.

    Same here. I normally just eat what sounds good.

    #209835

    38special
    Member

    From what I understand, Kiefer's explanation of the "secondary fat storage mechanism" may render the low fat backload to be useless.  Then again, the amount of available triglycerides for storage might be less if you follow the fat rules.

    yea i guess it would depend how high your normal fat intake is overall as well.. i dunno i never found it mattered much for CBL either way personally

    Same with me.

    Same here. I normally just eat what sounds good.

    #209836

    38special
    Member

    I concur.

    #209837

    Gl;itch.e
    Member

    From what I understand, Kiefer's explanation of the "secondary fat storage mechanism" may render the low fat backload to be useless.  Then again, the amount of available triglycerides for storage might be less if you follow the fat rules.

    yea i guess it would depend how high your normal fat intake is overall as well.. i dunno i never found it mattered much for CBL either way personally

    The "secondary fat storage mechanism" is an interesting one. Im not sure if keeping fat intake low would have much of an effect if calories are the same. Considering that gut bacteria can make a lot of SCFAs from certain foods (fibre, starches) and mead acid (omega -9) can be made from sugars. I think this makes the case for a "balanced" macro intake as the body obviously needs all three to function and will borrow from one (whether endogenously or exogenously sourced) to make up for a shortfall in another.

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Keifer lets us know he’s still alive

Please login / register in order to chat with others.

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?