LISS Cardio

  • This topic has 4 voices and 7 replies.
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #11768

    Nathan A Richmond
    Participant

    Although Kiefer generally prefers HIIT cardio over LISS I was wondering if there were those that still employ LISS cardio regularly? I prefer LISS for several reasons; less taxing on joints, I have an elliptical machine at home, and in the AM I am not physically ready to perform the higher intensity cardio. Is this something that has some flexibility to it or is this a case closed deal where HIIT is the only way?

    #226907

    realistically LISS is okay. It's the medium intensity zone you want to avoid,

    #226908

    Nathan A Richmond
    Participant

    Typically I am at 115-120 BPM roughly on the elliptical machine. Would you consider that low or medium? Usually like to go 45 min.

    #226909

    Typically I am at 115-120 BPM roughly on the elliptical machine. Would you consider that low or medium? Usually like to go 45 min.

    Depends on what your max heart rate is.

    #226910

    Brandon D Christ
    Participant

    I actually still don't buy the argument that steady state cardio is bad for your body composition.  I do think it's bad if you want to be muscular and obviously it will hurt strength gains, but everyone I have met that took up any kind of endurance training became leaner.

    #226911

    TCB
    Participant

    The general rule of thumb I've heard to quantify “appropriate” cardio speed is don't go above a level at which you could easily carry on a conversation with someone. Plus, I'd call walking LISS, and that's one of the best thing you can do.

    #226912

    I actually still don't buy the argument that steady state cardio is bad for your body composition.  I do think it's bad if you want to be muscular and obviously it will hurt strength gains, but everyone I have met that took up any kind of endurance training became leaner.

    I mostly agree. I think the problem is people who only train in the medium intensity zone all the time.When people train in a high intensity zone 1-3 times a week, the medium intensity zone 1-2 times a week, and a truly low intensity zone 1-3 times a week then I don't think there are any issues.

    #226913

    Brandon D Christ
    Participant

    I actually still don't buy the argument that steady state cardio is bad for your body composition.  I do think it's bad if you want to be muscular and obviously it will hurt strength gains, but everyone I have met that took up any kind of endurance training became leaner.

    I mostly agree. I think the problem is people who only train in the medium intensity zone all the time.When people train in a high intensity zone 1-3 times a week, the medium intensity zone 1-2 times a week, and a truly low intensity zone 1-3 times a week then I don't think there are any issues.

    You may be on to something.  I think people that try to use distance running for physique purposes tend to fail miserably and look like shit.  However, my friends that do endurance training for performance are all very lean.  They aren't muscular, but they are all under 10% body fat.  I think with variability of loading and (a big one) proper diet, endurance training is fine from a body composition point of view.  The fact is, not everyone wants to be big, jacked, and strong.  I think people need to just find the exercise they enjoy and eat right.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

LISS Cardio

Please login / register in order to chat with others.

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?