What I or we all thought that needed to be done.

  • This topic has 6 voices and 7 replies.
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2367

    Richard Schmitt
    Moderator

    I know I used to do this…sometimes still do…Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk

    #58818

    Brandon D Christ
    Participant

    I don't really understand.  Are you being sarcastic?

    #58819

    Richard Schmitt
    Moderator

    Pretty much. That eating is needed not eating nothing. Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk

    #58820

    McLeod2012
    Member

    It just goes back to where people think a calorie is a calorie. This might work for a short period of time. If you want to be miserable and skinny fat. Also, once you stop losing weight aren't eating ANYTHING, what will you do next? It's just dumb and unsafe.

    #58821

    Chuck
    Member

    Yea, especially with the media and government shooting nutritional advice out their ass- It’s their rhetoric that has doomed the baby boomers and almost generation X,Y, finally fats are considered good, carb cycling is suggested, and a calorie is not a calorie invented 300 years ago by burning our food.  ;D Funny times.

    #58822

    Brandon D Christ
    Participant

    Yea the USDA's nutritional advice is based on old studies taken out of context as well as commercial interests.  Also the medical profession deserves a lot of blame for this..

    #58823

    Kiefer
    Participant

    The real problem in this country is that our nutritional standards aren't based on any controlled research whatsoever, only observational work.As a brief example of the crappy results this produces, the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP)'s first dietary guidelines to reduce cholesterol levels followed the low-fat, low-saturated fat, low-animal fat paradigm to the letter. The result: the NCEP I diet was the most successful program to date for raising cholesterol levels, blood pressure and incidence of heart-attack. NCEP II wasn't much better. They're on NCEP III and they still haven't based the recommendations on a single study.

    #58824

    Dr. Rocky Patel
    Participant

    The real problem in this country is that our nutritional standards aren't based on any controlled research whatsoever, only observational work.As a brief example of the crappy results this produces, the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP)'s first dietary guidelines to reduce cholesterol levels followed the low-fat, low-saturated fat, low-animal fat paradigm to the letter. The result: the NCEP I diet was the most successful program to date for raising cholesterol levels, blood pressure and incidence of heart-attack. NCEP II wasn't much better. They're on NCEP III and they still haven't based the recommendations on a single study.

    +1

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

What I or we all thought that needed to be done.

Please login / register in order to chat with others.

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?