- This topic has 4 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 7 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
I just posted same in Carb Nite forum, sorry if already posted but I stopped following Kiefer’s diet ages ago. Wondering if everyone has seen this and whether it will affect your diet/lifestyle moving forward?
http://www.fitnflexed.com/article/john-kiefer-admits-carb-backloading-wrong
This is really taken out of context. You should go give the entire podcast a listen on Fat Burning Man.
Training Log: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vuwHRdBaPVILxxLhXly_N1Ys66Hcwk4j-bM7nvKSLrI/edit?usp=sharing
Kiefer specifically addressed this on his personal Facebook page as well as the Body IO Facebook page.
To clarify for the idiots of the internet who cannot understand simple English, let me make it clear: The Insulin Hypothesis as it stands is incomplete. My new hypothesis is a far more rigorous and compelling reason that supports both Carb Nite and CBL, answers criticisms about CBL and Ketogenic diets and defines the dietary spectrum from ketogenic to CNS, CBL and the disease causing high-carb diet.
This is really taken out of context. You should go give the entire podcast a listen on Fat Burning Man.
Thank you yre — I love Fat Burning Man. I will give this one a listen, for sure. 🙂
So this quote was out of context, but apparently there was something that Kiefer reconsidered and he subsequently formed a new hypothesis. Not sure about what as I find this statement just confusing and cannot make sense of it.
Now I wonder which part, if any, of the CBL book became outdated or in need of adjustment because of this. I just bought the book and it’s still called “1.0”, so there were no updates. Of course it would be great to make adjustments to benefit from the latest science…
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.